🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to pull out from an international accord created to safeguard women from violence, including family violence, following prolonged and intense discussions in the legislature.

Thousands of protesters assembled in Riga this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate decision now lies with President the nation's president, who must decide whether to endorse or reject the proposed law.

Referred to as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in Latvia last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to establish legal frameworks and support services to eliminate all types of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to begin the process of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a decision that human rights organizations characterized as a major regression for gender equality.

Political Debate and Resistance

The treaty was approved by the EU in last year, yet conservative groups have contended that its emphasis on equal rights weakens family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to withdraw from the treaty, a move proposed by opposition parties but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a setback for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who stood with protesters outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that abuse does not triumph," she stated to the crowd.

Political Divisions and Reactions

One of the main parties advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has called on the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official urged the agreement not to be made political, while the organization Equality Now asserted it was "not a danger to national principles, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent decision has sparked broad protest both within the country and abroad.

22,000 people have endorsed a national appeal demanding the convention to be preserved. The women's rights organization the rights center has announced a demonstration for the coming week, accusing MPs of ignoring the will of the nation's citizens.

Global Concerns and Possible Future Actions

The leader of the European organization's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a hasty decision driven by false information. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying regression for female equality and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He added that since Turkey left the convention four years ago, instances of femicide and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a two-thirds majority, the president could potentially return the legislation for further consideration if he holds objections.

President the national leader stated on digital platforms that he would evaluate the decision according to legal principles, "taking into account state and legal factors, rather than belief-based perspectives".

Recently, another member of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, indicated it would not exclude appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a worrisome development for gender equality not only in Latvia but across the continent," commented a rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in several EU countries
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could influence comparable debates in additional member states